Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Buvaysar Gadamauri vs Daniel De Jonge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gadamauri vs Jonge analysis and find out who is favored!
Buvaysar Gadamauri vs Daniel De Jonge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gadamauri 1 - 1 Jonge
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gadamauri has won 48.87% of points on their second serve, while Jonge has won 41.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gadamauri, in recent form, has won 48.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jonge has won 53.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.87% and 29.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gadamauri has saved 59.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonge has saved 59.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gadamauri has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 42/ 32), with Jonge winning 56.86% (W/L 29/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gadamauri has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 51/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 20/ 17). Jonge has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 29/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Gadamauri has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.72% of matches (W/L 38/ 29), where as Jonge has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gadamauri winning 1 times and Jonge being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gadamauri winning 3 and Jonge winning 2. The last match between Gadamauri and Jonge was at the M15 Huy, 25-08-2023, Second, Clay with Buvaysar Gadamauri getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gadamauri and Jonge have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gadamauri winning 0 times and Jonge 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Gadamauri winning 0, and Jonge 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gadamauri has played against opponents with an average rank of 241.7 while Jonge has played against players with an average rank of 140.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gadamauri has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonge has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gadamauri has converted 41.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonge has converted 40.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
535
Rank
521
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
59% (190-133)
Career Total W/L
56% (91-71)
43% (10-13)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Buvaysar Gadamauri vs Daniel De Jonge For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gadamauri VS Jonge
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Buvaysar Gadamauri | Daniel De Jonge |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 30 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:39:0 | 0:39:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (35/53) | 65% (40/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (26/35) | 57% (23/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (9/18) | 41% (9/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (30/62) | 34% (18/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel De Jonge
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(3) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Buvaysar Gadamauri | Daniel De Jonge |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (10/13) | 42% (5/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (23/32) | 42% (11/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (257/272) | 47% (105/117) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 80 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.63 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:36 | 1:25:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 294.78 | 56.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1035/1696) | 49% (320/657) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (695/1035) | 69% (221/320) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (323/661) | 41% (139/337) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (68/162) | 40% (23/57) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (635/1670) | 39% (237/613) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 38% (6/10) | 42% (5/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (10/23) | 42% (5/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 0% (6/0) |
Buvaysar Gadamauri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Gabriel Matuszewski
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Andrej Djokic
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Klintcharov
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Beaupain
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
116)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
43 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Jonas Forejtek
61%
(
67 of
110)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
43 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-0 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Martin Krumich
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel De Jonge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kaukovalta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
37%
(
24 of
65)
1st Serve %
31%
(
16 of
52)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Unknown Player
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
9 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
45
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Massimo Giunta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Daniel De Jonge
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ignasi Forcano
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Gadamauri Vs Jonge Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gadamauri are available here and Jonge photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Buvaysar Gadamauri
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
